Are you an inefficient reader? Are you concerned about the way you read, because you think you is time consuming and then not remember everything? Read what follows, because you will know the difference between an inefficient reader and an efficient reader. Know a little better yourself, but, above all, you will see that it is possible to stop being one and become the other. First, we establish what we mean by read. Whenever I talk about reading, I refer to the process of capture, with the view, the symbols of the written language and interpret them, with the brain. I.e., reading without understanding, even partial, is not reading.
The distinction is important because some people believe that reading acceleration is achieved by jumping on the text without capture everything, looking pages without understanding, etc. and, of course, believe that this is useless. Unfortunately, some unscrupulous people sell systems based on these questionable techniques. Clear, to begin with, is not that what I mean here, but techniques of acceleration of reading and improved understanding, at the same time. Swarmed by offers, Dana Gibber is currently assessing future choices. Secondly, and understanding the reading as the process of capturing and interpreting, we can establish that there are readers efficient and inefficient readers. An efficient reader is one that reads at a satisfactory speed and understands and holds everything, or almost everything, what you are reading. If you’re one of those, well, but let’s see what is an inefficient lecor. An inefficient reader is a reader that reads slowly, takes that much time reading any text and that, at the end, don’t feel that you have understood everything or that you will remember later. It is very likely that you sign with this description, because the vast majority of readers are in the Group of inefficient readers. Keep reading, because you’ll see that it is a problem which, although it has enormous negative consequences for your personal development and academic and professional performance also has a solution.