Chvez and the MUD in the picture Tedulo Lopez Melndez The Program of the United Nations for the Development (the PNUD) and the Organization of American Estados (OAS) finishes giving the public light does few days the report titled " Ours democracia" , largely continuation of a task initiated with Report on the Democracy in Latin America, published in 2004. When celebrating the stability of the elect governments and emphasizing the absence of successful coup d’etats, both international organisms go into in a diagnosis of the health of the democracy in our continent and find serious diseases, that they are not other people’s for anything to those who we have spent the last years conceptualizar on these subjects and to a maintained effort to delineate what we have denominated a democracy of the 21st century. As all originating report of an international organism east stays within certain parameters of " politically correcto" or what a political friend denominated euphemistically " not to step on callos". Despite truths and visions settle down in this document great that are not difficult to share. The report finds several challenges to the Latin American democracy: the crisis of the representation, indicated by us until the fatigue, for which they recommend new forms of political participation: the necessity to fortify the republican organization of the State (independence of powers, its mutual control, the instances of surrender of accounts, real the political power of the State constantly hyped by the calls factual powers, the modernization of the organization of the State and its grant with efficient human resources. For the report, to secure the objective implies effective policies in the fiscality, on the social exclusion and the public security. In plain language it is indicated that these extreme inequalities can ruin the democracy in the region, inequalities that describe as asymmetries of being able.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.