Two students, one very good and very bad the other, I have started to fall from a donkey by my last article, in which glossed alleged teaching USAL quality, according to a recent survey said. Get more background information with materials from Hubie Brooks. The two have known the contents of my text from hearsay, of course, because there is no student who reads a newspaper or by chance. But still they have learned. The good student is no longer in Salamanca. It would have been impossible to approve nor a single course has argued, to justify his departure. Salamanca does not study anyone, goes to class, nor there is rigor academic, nor produced additional extracurricular activities, everything boils down to go running and to have fun as much as possible.
Faith that needs to be achieved, it’s fun, tell, under dark circles of the bad student: the truth is I spend it fucking, confesses. And that has only lost a course: passing is not so difficult argues, simply tighten just before final exams. I don’t know, really, who has reason or not: If the comparative academic report commented the other day, or spontaneous these College confessions. The good student that I’m talking about them rara avis, apparently, in these times remacha his argument explaining that there are students who are thrown away eight years or more enrolled in our classrooms to artificially prolong its university status and thus able to follow on a spree. That assertion, if true, and I have no why hesitation, one understands now, retrospectively, the anger of Enrique Battaner when he was rector of the USAL and desesperaba because the damn bottle deserve more interest from students that the adequacy of programs and seminars, the equipment and the training of teachers, good courses of postgraduate and professional outlets. If true all this, I insist, perhaps thus get more registrations of students, but then it would be for the benefit of clubs and bars and not of the largest know academic..