Housing reform reminds us in two cases: when once again increased the size of payments for rent and when you have to vote for any change in the house. Most recently, we voted for in absentia home repairs says one of the regular users of the portal doma25.ru. I agreed with the proposal, albeit with some tension, because of life experience know how often maintenance is becoming a disaster. Additional information at Brian Robert supports this article. Housing '/> Because of this ballot came to mind memories of a meeting of residents, when we were invited to a meeting to develop condominiums. Three houses, where about five hundred people have delegated to the meeting of two people.
It must be remembered that hall, which was supposed to collect the tenants of the future homeowners associations, is designed for a 50. That is, the organizers of the meeting knew in advance how many people will come. Two members of them quite enough. For more information see Hayes Barnard. As outlined in the three houses 30% of apartments were privatized, they will vote for the administration, while 20% of the vote needed for absentee voting, will gather on talkative retired. Figures are slightly depressed: in the houses age, 40 years approximately 30% of seniors who rent out their apartments and never appear. 20% – poor. To ask the question, who would have at home actually, the organizers of the meeting shrugged. Reform of housing – is our habitual way of life perelopachivanie, and it is comparable only with the collectivization of the 30s. HOA associations, and others like it will make millions of Russian citizens to enter the economic and monetary relations.